Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

St. Mary's Franco-american Petroleum Company v. West Virginia

• 1906 • 203 U.S. 183 • Fuller Court
In the 1906 case of St. Mary's Franco-American Petroleum Company v. West Virginia, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of West Virginia, upholding its right to tax corporations operating within its borders. The plaintiff, a French corporation with operations in West Virginia, argued that it should not be subject to state taxes because it was incorporated under French law and had already paid taxes there. However, the court held that as long as a foreign corporation conducts business within a...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1906
Docket: 98
203 U.S. 183
27 S. Ct. 132
51 L. Ed. 144
1906 U.S. LEXIS 1581

St. Mary's Franco-american Petroleum Company v. West Virginia

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1906 case of St. Mary's Franco-American Petroleum Company v. West Virginia, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of West Virginia, upholding its right to tax corporations operating within its borders. The plaintiff, a French corporation with operations in West Virginia, argued that it should not be subject to state taxes because it was incorporated under French law and had already paid taxes there. However, the court held that as long as a foreign corporation conducts business within a state’s boundaries and benefits from protections provided by that state (such as police protection or access to courts), it is liable for taxation just like any domestic company would be. This decision reinforced states' rights over their internal affairs and set an important precedent regarding corporate taxation.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of St. Mary's Franco-American Petroleum Company v. West Virginia argued that the state had no right to tax oil and gas reserves as real estate property, because these resources are not owned until they have been extracted from the ground. The justices contended that such taxation was a violation of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment, as it amounted to taking private property without just compensation. They also pointed out inconsistencies in how different states treated oil and gas rights for taxation purposes, arguing this lack of uniformity further demonstrated its unfairness. Furthermore, they disagreed with majority’s view on considering unextracted minerals as part of land ownership; instead believing them to be separate entities only becoming personal property upon extraction.

Opinion written by Justice MWFuller
Decided: Dec 03, 1906
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms