Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Standard Pipe Line Company v. Miller County Highway & Bridge District

• 1927 • 277 U.S. 160 • Taft Court
In the case of Standard Pipe Line Company v. Miller County Highway & Bridge District, 1927, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a county highway district in Arkansas had the authority to levy taxes on oil pipelines that crossed through its jurisdiction. The pipeline company argued that it should not be subject to these taxes because it was an interstate business and therefore only subjectable to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. However, after...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1927
Docket: 577
277 U.S. 160
48 S. Ct. 441
72 L. Ed. 831
1928 U.S. LEXIS 881
Argued: Apr 20, 1928

Standard Pipe Line Company v. Miller County Highway & Bridge District

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Standard Pipe Line Company v. Miller County Highway & Bridge District, 1927, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a county highway district in Arkansas had the authority to levy taxes on oil pipelines that crossed through its jurisdiction. The pipeline company argued that it should not be subject to these taxes because it was an interstate business and therefore only subjectable to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. However, after reviewing previous cases and legal principles related to taxation and commerce clause jurisprudence, the court ruled against Standard Pipe Line Company. It held that while Congress has exclusive power over interstate commerce, this does not prevent states from exercising their traditional taxing powers unless such exercise directly interferes with congressional regulations or burdens interstate commerce excessively. Therefore, as long as state tax laws do not discriminate against or place undue burden on interstate businesses compared with intrastate ones they are generally permissible.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Standard Pipe Line Company v. Miller County Highway & Bridge District argued that the majority's decision to allow a county highway district to tax an interstate pipeline company was inconsistent with previous rulings and violated principles of federalism. The dissenters contended that, as an interstate business, the pipeline company should only be subject to taxation by states where it had a physical presence or conducted substantial business activities. They further asserted that allowing local entities such as counties or districts to impose taxes on such companies would lead to excessive and potentially discriminatory taxation, undermining national economic unity and efficiency. Moreover, they disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "property" for tax purposes; arguing instead that intangible assets like franchise rights could not be considered property within any particular state unless used there in some significant way.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: May 14, 1928
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms