Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Stephenson v. Brooklyn Cross-town Railroad Company

• 1884 • 114 U.S. 149 • Waite Court
Stephenson v. Brooklyn Cross-Town Railroad Company was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a collision between two of its trains. The plaintiff, Stephenson, was a passenger on one of the trains and was injured in the collision. He sued the railroad company for damages, claiming that the company was negligent in its operation of the trains. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was liable for the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1884
Docket: 195
114 U.S. 149
5 S. Ct. 777
29 L. Ed. 58
1885 U.S. LEXIS 1746
Argued: Mar 11, 1885

Stephenson v. Brooklyn Cross-town Railroad Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Stephenson v. Brooklyn Cross-Town Railroad Company was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a collision between two of its trains. The plaintiff, Stephenson, was a passenger on one of the trains and was injured in the collision. He sued the railroad company for damages, claiming that the company was negligent in its operation of the trains. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was liable for the damages caused by the collision. The Court found that the company had a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation of its trains, and that it had breached this duty by failing to take proper precautions to prevent the collision. The Court also held that the company was liable for the damages caused by the collision, even though the collision was caused by the negligence of the engineer of one of the trains. The Court's decision in this case established the principle that a railroad company is liable for damages caused by its negligence in the operation of its trains. This principle has been applied in numerous cases since then, and is still used today to determine the liability of railroad companies for damages caused by their negligence.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Stephenson v. Brooklyn Cross-Town Railroad Company, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a railroad company could be held liable for injuries sustained by an employee while working on its tracks. The majority opinion found that the company was not liable because it had taken reasonable precautions to protect its employees from harm and that any negligence on the part of the employee should have been foreseeable. Justice Field dissented, arguing that employers are responsible for providing safe working conditions and must take all necessary steps to ensure their employees' safety regardless of any contributory negligence on behalf of those employees. He argued further that since this particular employer failed in its duty to provide adequate protection against injury, it should be held accountable for damages caused by such failure.

Opinion written by Justice WBWoods
Decided: Mar 23, 1885
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms