Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Stewart Et Al. v. United States

• 1941 • 316 U.S. 354 • Stone Court
In the case of Stewart et al. v. United States, 1941, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter involving conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government by impeding and impairing its lawful functions. The defendants were charged with conspiring to sell distilled spirits without paying taxes or obtaining permits required under federal law, thereby defrauding the government of tax revenue and obstructing its regulatory authority over alcohol production and distribution. The key issue was whether such...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1941
Docket: 848
316 U.S. 354
62 S. Ct. 1154
86 L. Ed. 1529
1942 U.S. LEXIS 1059
Argued: Apr 27, 1942

Stewart Et Al. v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Stewart et al. v. United States, 1941, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter involving conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government by impeding and impairing its lawful functions. The defendants were charged with conspiring to sell distilled spirits without paying taxes or obtaining permits required under federal law, thereby defrauding the government of tax revenue and obstructing its regulatory authority over alcohol production and distribution. The key issue was whether such conduct constituted a "conspiracy to defraud" within the meaning of Section 37 (now Section 371) of the Criminal Code. In their appeal, they argued that this provision only applied when there was an intent to cause financial loss or property damage. However, in a unanimous decision written by Justice Felix Frankfurter, it held that "defraud" in this context had broader implications than just causing pecuniary or property loss—it also encompassed any scheme designed to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceitful means. Therefore, even though no actual financial harm may have been intended or occurred as a result from their actions—their intention alone sufficed for conviction under Section 37.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Stewart et al. v. United States, Justice Frank Murphy argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established legal principles and an unwarranted expansion of federal power over state affairs. He contended that the defendants' actions did not constitute a conspiracy to defraud the United States because they had no intent to cause financial or property loss to the government; rather, their aim was merely regulatory evasion which should be punished under appropriate state laws instead of being federally prosecuted as frauds against U.S. The justice also expressed concern about potential misuse of such broad interpretation in future cases where individuals might be unfairly charged with conspiracies based on minor violations of administrative regulations or policies without any actual harm done to national interests.

Opinion written by Justice OJRoberts
Decided: May 25, 1942
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms