Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Stone Et Al. v. Graham, Superintendent Of Public Instruction Of Kentucky

• 1980 • 449 U.S. 39 • Burger Court
In the case of Stone et al. v. Graham, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Kentucky in 1980, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a Kentucky statute requiring the posting of a copy of the Ten Commandments on classroom walls in public schools violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause. The court held that while teaching about religion or using religious texts for educational purposes was permissible under certain circumstances, this particular law had no secular legislative purpose and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1980
Docket: 80-321
449 U.S. 39
101 S. Ct. 192
66 L. Ed. 2d 199
1980 U.S. LEXIS 2

Stone Et Al. v. Graham, Superintendent Of Public Instruction Of Kentucky

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Stone et al. v. Graham, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Kentucky in 1980, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a Kentucky statute requiring the posting of a copy of the Ten Commandments on classroom walls in public schools violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause. The court held that while teaching about religion or using religious texts for educational purposes was permissible under certain circumstances, this particular law had no secular legislative purpose and thus constituted an unconstitutional endorsement and promotion of religion by government authorities. The decision emphasized that any law respecting an establishment of religion is forbidden by Constitution even if its observance is voluntary and it does not favor one religion over another.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Stone v. Graham, Justice Rehnquist argued that the majority's decision to strike down a Kentucky statute requiring public schools to display copies of the Ten Commandments was based on an overly broad interpretation of the Establishment Clause. He contended that there was no evidence suggesting that displaying these religious texts had any coercive effect on students or constituted government endorsement of religion. Instead, he viewed it as a permissible acknowledgment of our nation's religious heritage and culture. Furthermore, he criticized the majority for failing to consider historical context in their analysis and suggested they were imposing modern secularism onto past events and traditions. In his view, this approach threatened many longstanding practices such as legislative prayer or references to God in national symbols which have been widely accepted despite having some religious significance.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Nov 17, 1980
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms