Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Sunray Mid-continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission

• 1959 • 364 U.S. 137 • Warren Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission in 1959 revolved around the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission (FPC) over natural gas companies and their sales contracts for interstate commerce, specifically when those contracts involve direct industrial consumers rather than public utilities or local distribution companies. The court ruled that under Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act, FPC has no jurisdiction over such sales made directly to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1959
Docket: 335
364 U.S. 137
80 S. Ct. 1392
4 L. Ed. 2d 1623
1960 U.S. LEXIS 1868
Argued: Apr 26, 1960

Sunray Mid-continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission in 1959 revolved around the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission (FPC) over natural gas companies and their sales contracts for interstate commerce, specifically when those contracts involve direct industrial consumers rather than public utilities or local distribution companies. The court ruled that under Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act, FPC has no jurisdiction over such sales made directly to industrial users for their own use and not for resale - a decision which overturned an earlier ruling by a lower court that had granted FPC authority in this area. This landmark decision clarified the limits of federal regulatory power regarding natural gas industries' transactions with end-users.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission, Justice Brennan argued that the majority's decision to uphold the Federal Power Commission's (FPC) jurisdiction over independent producers of natural gas was incorrect and inconsistent with previous rulings by Congress and the Supreme Court itself. He contended that this ruling would result in a significant expansion of FPC authority beyond what was intended by lawmakers when they passed relevant legislation such as Natural Gas Act. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative impacts on small businesses due to increased regulatory burden imposed by FPC oversight, which could potentially stifle competition within industry sector. Lastly, he criticized majority’s interpretation of “public interest” standard used in determining whether or not certain business practices should be regulated under Natural Gas Act.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jun 27, 1960
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms