Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Superior Bath House Co. v. Mccarroll, Commissioner Of Revenues Of Arkansas

• 1940 • 312 U.S. 176 • Hughes Court
In the 1940 case of Superior Bath House Co. v. McCarroll, Commissioner of Revenues of Arkansas, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state could impose a tax on federal property leased to private entities for commercial use. The Superior Bath House Company operated in federally owned buildings located within Hot Springs National Park in Arkansas and argued that they should not be subject to state taxes as their operations were on federal land. However, the State Revenue...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1940
Docket: 180
312 U.S. 176
61 S. Ct. 503
85 L. Ed. 721
1941 U.S. LEXIS 968

Superior Bath House Co. v. Mccarroll, Commissioner Of Revenues Of Arkansas

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1940 case of Superior Bath House Co. v. McCarroll, Commissioner of Revenues of Arkansas, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state could impose a tax on federal property leased to private entities for commercial use. The Superior Bath House Company operated in federally owned buildings located within Hot Springs National Park in Arkansas and argued that they should not be subject to state taxes as their operations were on federal land. However, the State Revenue Commissioner disagreed and imposed taxes on them anyway. The court ruled in favor of the State Revenue Commissioner by upholding that states have power to tax businesses operating on federal lands if those businesses are engaged in non-governmental functions or activities. This decision established an important precedent regarding taxation powers between different levels of government.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Superior Bath House Co. v. McCarroll, Justice Black argued that Arkansas' tax on thermal water was unconstitutional as it violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution by interfering with interstate commerce. He contended that since Congress had not authorized states to regulate or tax this natural resource, any state-imposed regulation or taxation would be an encroachment upon federal authority over interstate commerce and thus invalid under constitutional law. Furthermore, he asserted that if each state were allowed to impose its own regulations and taxes on these resources without congressional approval, it could lead to a chaotic situation where different states have conflicting laws regarding their use and distribution.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Feb 03, 1941
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms