Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Swann Et Al. v. Charlotte-mecklenburg Board Of Education Et Al.

• 1970 • 402 U.S. 1 • Burger Court
The Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case in 1970 was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that dealt with the desegregation of public schools. The court ruled unanimously, stating that federal courts had the authority to oversee and produce remedies for state-imposed segregation, including busing students to non-neighborhood schools if necessary. This ruling came after Darius and Vera Swann sued the school board on behalf of their son James, who had been...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1970
Docket: 281
402 U.S. 1
91 S. Ct. 1267
28 L. Ed. 2d 554
1971 U.S. LEXIS 52
Argued: Oct 12, 1970

Swann Et Al. v. Charlotte-mecklenburg Board Of Education Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case in 1970 was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that dealt with the desegregation of public schools. The court ruled unanimously, stating that federal courts had the authority to oversee and produce remedies for state-imposed segregation, including busing students to non-neighborhood schools if necessary. This ruling came after Darius and Vera Swann sued the school board on behalf of their son James, who had been denied entrance into an integrated school closer to his home due to districting lines drawn based on race. The court's decision effectively ended de jure racial segregation in Southern public schools and set a precedent for future cases dealing with institutional racial discrimination.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Justice Hugo Black expressed concern over judicial overreach and a departure from constitutional principles. He argued that while desegregation was necessary, it should not be achieved through forced busing or by mandating racial balance in schools as these measures were not explicitly required by the Constitution or Brown v. Board of Education ruling. He believed such actions could potentially infringe upon states' rights to manage their own school systems and might lead to further social division rather than integration. Furthermore, he feared that this decision would set a precedent for courts to intervene excessively in local affairs based on subjective interpretations of what is 'right', instead of strictly adhering to constitutional mandates.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Apr 20, 1971
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms