Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Taylor v. Columbian University (Now Known In Law As George Washington University)

• 1912 • 226 U.S. 126 • White Court
In the case of Taylor v. Columbian University (now known as George Washington University), 1912, the plaintiff, Mr. Taylor, sued the university for breach of contract after he was dismissed from his position at the institution without any given reason or notice period. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mr. Taylor stating that a professor's employment is not terminable at will and requires just cause for dismissal under contractual law principles unless otherwise specified in their contract...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1912
Docket: 41
226 U.S. 126
33 S. Ct. 73
57 L. Ed. 152
1912 U.S. LEXIS 2136
Argued: Nov 06, 1912

Taylor v. Columbian University (Now Known In Law As George Washington University)

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Taylor v. Columbian University (now known as George Washington University), 1912, the plaintiff, Mr. Taylor, sued the university for breach of contract after he was dismissed from his position at the institution without any given reason or notice period. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mr. Taylor stating that a professor's employment is not terminable at will and requires just cause for dismissal under contractual law principles unless otherwise specified in their contract terms. This decision set an important precedent regarding academic tenure and job security within educational institutions across America.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Taylor v. Columbian University (now known as George Washington University) argued that the university was not liable for damages after a student, Taylor, injured himself while conducting an experiment unsupervised. The justice held that when students voluntarily engage in potentially dangerous activities without supervision or instruction from their professors, they assume all risks associated with those activities. Therefore, it is unreasonable to hold universities responsible for injuries resulting from such actions because they cannot possibly supervise every action taken by each student on campus at all times. Furthermore, the justice believed that this ruling could set a dangerous precedent where universities would be forced to limit educational opportunities due to fear of potential lawsuits.

Opinion written by Justice JMcKenna
Decided: Dec 02, 1912
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms