Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Terry Et Al. v. Adams Et Al.

• 1952 • 345 U.S. 461 • Vinson Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Terry et al. v. Adams et al., dealt with the issue of racial discrimination in voting practices by private organizations, specifically the Jaybird Democratic Association in Texas which excluded African Americans from its pre-primary elections. The court ruled that this practice violated the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibits denial or abridgment of citizens' right to vote on account of race or color. Despite being a private organization, it was determined that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1952
Docket: 52
345 U.S. 461
73 S. Ct. 809
97 L. Ed. 2d 1152
1953 U.S. LEXIS 2603
Argued: Jan 16, 1953

Terry Et Al. v. Adams Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Terry et al. v. Adams et al., dealt with the issue of racial discrimination in voting practices by private organizations, specifically the Jaybird Democratic Association in Texas which excluded African Americans from its pre-primary elections. The court ruled that this practice violated the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibits denial or abridgment of citizens' right to vote on account of race or color. Despite being a private organization, it was determined that the Jaybird Association held significant influence over public electoral outcomes and thus had an obligation to uphold constitutional rights regarding suffrage. This landmark decision further solidified prohibitions against racially discriminatory voting practices and expanded protections for minority voters.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Terry et al. v. Adams et al., Justice Minton, joined by Justices Reed and Burton, argued that the Fifteenth Amendment does not apply to private organizations like the Jaybird Democratic Association because they are not state actors. They contended that while it was clear that African Americans were being excluded from participating in this political organization's activities, this exclusion did not violate their constitutional rights as these actions were taken by a private entity rather than a government body. The justices emphasized that if any change is needed regarding discrimination within private associations or clubs, it should be addressed through legislation instead of judicial interpretation of existing laws and amendments.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: May 04, 1953
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms