Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved Texaco Inc. and other oil companies challenging the New Jersey Division of Taxation's method for calculating corporate income tax liability. The dispute centered on whether New Jersey could include dividends received from subsidiaries in its apportionment formula to determine a corporation’s taxable income within the state. Texaco argued that this method resulted in unconstitutional double taxation, as it taxed out-of-state activities not sufficiently connected to New Jersey, violating both the Due Process Clause and Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court held that New Jersey's tax scheme was constitutional because it fairly apportioned taxes based on business activity conducted within the state, thus satisfying due process requirements by having a rational relationship with values connected to taxing jurisdiction.
Opinion written by Justice Blackmun
Decided 3 Apr 1989 · Official report