Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Texas Company v. Brown, Individually And As Commissioner Of Agriculture Of Georgia, Et Al.

• 1921 • 258 U.S. 466 • Taft Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Texas Company v. Brown, individually and as Commissioner of Agriculture of Georgia, et al., 1921 revolved around the constitutionality of a Georgia law that imposed taxes on out-of-state corporations for storing gasoline in public warehouses within the state. The Texas Company argued that this tax was discriminatory and violated both the Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it did not apply to in-state companies or individuals who...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1921
Docket: 126
258 U.S. 466
42 S. Ct. 375
66 L. Ed. 721
1922 U.S. LEXIS 2294
Argued: Oct 13, 1921

Texas Company v. Brown, Individually And As Commissioner Of Agriculture Of Georgia, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Texas Company v. Brown, individually and as Commissioner of Agriculture of Georgia, et al., 1921 revolved around the constitutionality of a Georgia law that imposed taxes on out-of-state corporations for storing gasoline in public warehouses within the state. The Texas Company argued that this tax was discriminatory and violated both the Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it did not apply to in-state companies or individuals who stored gasoline similarly. However, the court upheld Georgia's right to impose such a tax, stating that it was within its power under police regulations aimed at protecting public safety due to potential fire hazards associated with storing large quantities of gasoline. The court also found no violation against equal protection since there were substantial differences between local dealers who had full control over their products versus non-resident corporations using public storage facilities.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Texas Company v. Brown, Justice Holmes argued that the Georgia law in question did not violate the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution as it was a valid exercise of state police power to protect public health and safety. He disagreed with majority's view that Georgia's regulation on gasoline storage exceeded its authority under interstate commerce regulations, asserting instead that states should have broad latitude to regulate businesses within their borders for public welfare purposes even if such regulations indirectly affect interstate commerce. Furthermore, he contended that any potential burden imposed by this law on interstate commerce was incidental and permissible because it served an important local interest - preventing dangerous explosions from improperly stored gasoline.

Opinion written by Justice MPitney
Decided: Apr 17, 1922
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms