Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Annie Lindsley

• 1881 • 104 U.S. 185 • Waite Court
The Annie Lindsley was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1881. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the Annie Lindsley, a vessel, and the owners of the steamer, the City of New York. The owners of the Annie Lindsley claimed that the City of New York had negligently caused the Annie Lindsley to be damaged while the two vessels were in close proximity. The owners of the Annie Lindsley sought damages from the owners of the City of New York. The Supreme Court held...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1881
Docket: 97
104 U.S. 185
26 L. Ed. 716
1881 U.S. LEXIS 1988
Argued: Nov 17, 1881

The Annie Lindsley

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Annie Lindsley was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1881. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the Annie Lindsley, a vessel, and the owners of the steamer, the City of New York. The owners of the Annie Lindsley claimed that the City of New York had negligently caused the Annie Lindsley to be damaged while the two vessels were in close proximity. The owners of the Annie Lindsley sought damages from the owners of the City of New York. The Supreme Court held that the owners of the City of New York were liable for the damages caused to the Annie Lindsley. The Court found that the City of New York had been negligent in its operation of the vessel, and that the negligence had caused the damage to the Annie Lindsley. The Court also held that the owners of the City of New York were liable for the damages even though the Annie Lindsley had been in close proximity to the City of New York. The Court's decision in The Annie Lindsley established the principle that a vessel's owners are liable for damages caused by their negligence, even if the damages were caused by another vessel in close proximity. This principle has been applied in numerous cases since The Annie Lindsley, and is still an important part of maritime law today.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of The Annie Lindsley, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a vessel that had been sold in good faith by its owner could be held liable for debts incurred by its former owners. The majority opinion found that the vessel should not be held liable because it had already been sold and no longer belonged to those who owed money. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision on two grounds: first, he argued that under maritime law vessels were subject to liens regardless of ownership; second, he argued that even if such a lien did not exist at common law or under maritime law, Congress still had authority to create one through legislation. He concluded his dissent with an argument against allowing debtors to escape their obligations simply by transferring title of property they owned without paying off any outstanding debts.

Opinion written by Justice WBWoods
Decided: Dec 05, 1881
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms