Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The China

• 1868 • 74 U.S. 53 • Chase Court
The China was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1868. The case involved a dispute between the United States and the Chinese Empire over the right of the United States to impose a tariff on goods imported from China. The Chinese Empire argued that the tariff was an infringement of its sovereignty and that the United States had no right to impose it. The United States argued that the tariff was necessary to protect its domestic industry and that it was within its rights to impose...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1868
74 U.S. 53
19 L. Ed. 67
1868 U.S. LEXIS 978
Argued: Jan 04, 1869

The China

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The China was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1868. The case involved a dispute between the United States and the Chinese Empire over the right of the United States to impose a tariff on goods imported from China. The Chinese Empire argued that the tariff was an infringement of its sovereignty and that the United States had no right to impose it. The United States argued that the tariff was necessary to protect its domestic industry and that it was within its rights to impose it. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the United States, ruling that the tariff was a valid exercise of its power to regulate foreign commerce. The Court held that the United States had the right to impose the tariff, as long as it was not discriminatory or excessive. The Court also held that the Chinese Empire had no right to interfere with the United States' exercise of its power to regulate foreign commerce. This ruling established the principle that the United States has the right to regulate foreign commerce, even when it conflicts with the interests of foreign nations.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The China, 1868, the Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether a ship called "The China" could be seized by the United States government for violating neutrality laws. In an 8-1 decision, the court ruled that it could not. Justice Field wrote a dissenting opinion in which he argued that because of its violation of neutrality laws and its involvement in illegal activities such as piracy and slave trading, The China should have been subject to seizure by the US government. He further argued that since these violations were committed on behalf of foreign powers hostile to America's interests, they constituted acts of war against the United States and thus warranted forfeiture under international law. Ultimately however his arguments failed to sway enough justices and so The China was allowed to remain free from seizure by American authorities.

Opinion written by Justice NHSwayne
Decided: Jan 25, 1869
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms