Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Corporation Of New-orleans v. Winter Et Al.

1816 • 14 U.S. 91 • Marshall Court
The Corporation of New-Orleans v. Winter et al. was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1816 that centered around whether or not the state of Louisiana had authority to grant land titles within its boundaries. The court found that it did, and ruled in favor of the corporation, holding that Congress had given Louisiana full power over all lands within its borders when it became a state in 1812. This decision established an important precedent for states' rights and their ability...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1816
14 U.S. 91
4 L. Ed. 44
1816 U.S. LEXIS 311
Argued: Feb 24, 1816

The Corporation Of New-orleans v. Winter Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Corporation of New-Orleans v. Winter et al. was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1816 that centered around whether or not the state of Louisiana had authority to grant land titles within its boundaries. The court found that it did, and ruled in favor of the corporation, holding that Congress had given Louisiana full power over all lands within its borders when it became a state in 1812. This decision established an important precedent for states' rights and their ability to control public lands within their own boundaries without interference from federal authorities. It also affirmed the right of individuals to hold valid title deeds issued by states even if they were granted before those states joined the Union as sovereign entities with exclusive jurisdiction over such matters.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The Corporation of New-Orleans v. Winter et al., the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a state law that allowed for the sale of property seized by creditors in order to pay off debts was constitutional. Justice Johnson, writing for the dissenters, argued that states have no power to pass laws which interfere with contracts made between individuals and corporations. He further argued that such interference would be an unconstitutional violation of private rights and liberties as protected under Article I Section 10 Clause 1 of the United States Constitution (the Contract Clause). Furthermore, he asserted that Congress has exclusive authority over interstate commerce and any attempt by a state legislature to regulate it is unconstitutional. In conclusion, Justice Johnson believed this particular law should not stand because it violated both individual rights as well as congressional powers granted under the US Constitution.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms