Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Frances, Boyer, Master. (Graham's Claim.

1814 • 12 U.S. 348 • Marshall Court
The Frances, Boyer, Master (Graham's Claim) was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1814. The dispute centered around a ship called the Frances and its cargo of tobacco that had been seized by British forces during the War of 1812. The owner of the vessel, John Graham, brought suit against William Boyer and Thomas Master for failing to pay him compensation for his losses due to their negligence in protecting his property from being taken by enemy forces. In an opinion delivered...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1814
12 U.S. 348
3 L. Ed. 585
1814 U.S. LEXIS 433

The Frances, Boyer, Master. (Graham's Claim.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Frances, Boyer, Master (Graham's Claim) was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1814. The dispute centered around a ship called the Frances and its cargo of tobacco that had been seized by British forces during the War of 1812. The owner of the vessel, John Graham, brought suit against William Boyer and Thomas Master for failing to pay him compensation for his losses due to their negligence in protecting his property from being taken by enemy forces. In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Marshall, it was held that although there may have been some degree of fault on behalf of Boyer and Master in not taking sufficient precautions to protect Graham’s property from seizure or destruction at sea; they were still entitled to recover damages as long as they could prove that their actions did not amount to gross negligence or willful misconduct. This decision established important precedent regarding liability issues related to maritime law which is still applicable today.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of The Frances, Boyer, Master (Graham's Claim), Justice Johnson delivered a dissenting opinion. He argued that the Court should not have decided on the merits of Graham’s claim because he had failed to comply with certain formalities required by law. Specifically, Johnson noted that Graham had neglected to file his petition in court within three years after it was due and also failed to provide sufficient proof for his claim. Furthermore, Johnson asserted that even if these issues were overlooked and Graham’s petition was considered on its merits, there still would be no basis for granting him relief as he did not present any evidence or argument demonstrating how his rights were violated or why he deserved compensation from either party involved in this dispute. Ultimately, Justice Johnson concluded that since all legal requirements were not met and no substantive arguments presented by Graham supporting his claims existed; therefore judgment should have been rendered against him instead of deciding upon the merits of this case at all.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms