Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Germanic

• 1904 • 196 U.S. 589 • Fuller Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case "The Germanic" in 1904 revolved around a collision between two ships, The Germanic and The Mohegan, off the coast of New Jersey. At issue was whether or not the owners of The Germanic were liable for damages to cargo on board The Mohegan at the time of their accident. In this maritime law case, it was determined that although both vessels had been negligent leading up to their collision - with neither ship maintaining proper lookout nor adhering strictly to sailing...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1904
Docket: 128
196 U.S. 589
25 S. Ct. 317
49 L. Ed. 610
1905 U.S. LEXIS 927
Argued: Jan 13, 1905

The Germanic

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case "The Germanic" in 1904 revolved around a collision between two ships, The Germanic and The Mohegan, off the coast of New Jersey. At issue was whether or not the owners of The Germanic were liable for damages to cargo on board The Mohegan at the time of their accident. In this maritime law case, it was determined that although both vessels had been negligent leading up to their collision - with neither ship maintaining proper lookout nor adhering strictly to sailing rules - only one (The Mohegan) could be held responsible for damage done after impact due its failure to take appropriate action post-collision. This ruling established an important precedent in admiralty law: when both parties are found guilty of negligence causing a collision but only one is guilty concerning subsequent events resulting from said collision, then that party alone must bear full responsibility for all ensuing damages.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for The Germanic case in 1904, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. disagreed with the majority's decision to hold a ship liable for damages caused by its wake. He argued that there was no negligence on part of the ship as it had followed all necessary precautions and regulations while navigating through New York Harbor. According to him, any damage caused due to the swell or wave created by a passing vessel is an inevitable consequence of navigation and should not be considered as grounds for liability unless there is clear evidence of fault or negligence from the vessel's side. This view challenged traditional maritime law which held ships responsible for damages caused by their wakes regardless of whether they were at fault or not.

Opinion written by Justice OWHolmes
Decided: Feb 20, 1905
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms