Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Illinois

• 1880 • 103 U.S. 298 • Waite Court
The Illinois is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1881. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the steamship Illinois and the owners of the steamship St. Lawrence. The Illinois had been damaged in a collision with the St. Lawrence, and the owners of the Illinois sought to recover damages from the owners of the St. Lawrence. The Supreme Court held that the owners of the Illinois were entitled to recover damages from the owners of the St. Lawrence. The Supreme...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1880
Docket: 275
103 U.S. 298
26 L. Ed. 562
1880 U.S. LEXIS 2118
Argued: Apr 20, 1881

The Illinois

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Illinois is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1881. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the steamship Illinois and the owners of the steamship St. Lawrence. The Illinois had been damaged in a collision with the St. Lawrence, and the owners of the Illinois sought to recover damages from the owners of the St. Lawrence. The Supreme Court held that the owners of the Illinois were entitled to recover damages from the owners of the St. Lawrence. The Supreme Court held that the owners of the Illinois were entitled to recover damages because the St. Lawrence had been negligent in the operation of its vessel. The Court found that the St. Lawrence had failed to take proper precautions to avoid the collision, and that the Illinois had been damaged as a result. The Court also held that the owners of the Illinois were entitled to recover damages for the loss of the vessel, as well as for the loss of its cargo. The Supreme Court's decision in The Illinois established the principle that a vessel owner is liable for damages caused by the negligent operation of its vessel. This principle has been applied in numerous cases since then, and is still the law today.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of The Illinois, Justice Field delivered a dissenting opinion. He argued that the majority's decision was based on an erroneous interpretation of the law and would lead to unjust results. According to Field, Congress had not intended for navigable waters in one state to be subject to taxation by another state. Furthermore, he noted that such a ruling could have serious implications for interstate commerce and navigation rights as it would allow states with larger populations or more resources to tax goods from other states without their consent. Additionally, Field argued that allowing this type of taxation could create confusion among citizens who may not understand which laws apply when crossing into different jurisdictions. Ultimately, he concluded that Congress should decide whether or not such taxes are permissible under federal law rather than leaving it up to individual states' discretion.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: May 02, 1881
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms