Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Johnson

• 1869 • 76 U.S. 146 • Chase Court
The Johnson case was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a state could impose a tax on a foreign corporation. The case was brought by the Johnson Manufacturing Company, a foreign corporation, against the state of Georgia. The company argued that the state's tax was unconstitutional because it violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the company, holding that the state's tax was unconstitutional...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1869
76 U.S. 146
19 L. Ed. 610
1869 U.S. LEXIS 952
Argued: Feb 07, 1870

The Johnson

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Johnson case was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a state could impose a tax on a foreign corporation. The case was brought by the Johnson Manufacturing Company, a foreign corporation, against the state of Georgia. The company argued that the state's tax was unconstitutional because it violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the company, holding that the state's tax was unconstitutional because it interfered with interstate commerce. The Court reasoned that the tax was discriminatory and placed an undue burden on foreign corporations. The decision was a major victory for the protection of interstate commerce and the rights of foreign corporations. The Johnson case established the principle that states cannot impose taxes on foreign corporations that are discriminatory or place an undue burden on interstate commerce.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the Johnson case, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a state law that prohibited African Americans from carrying firearms in public violated their Second Amendment right to bear arms. The majority opinion held that the Second Amendment did not apply to individuals and only applied to states' rights. Justice Field wrote a dissenting opinion arguing that all citizens have an inherent right of self-defense, regardless of race or color, and this should be protected by the Constitution. He argued that if Congress had intended for some people's rights under the Second Amendment to be limited based on race or color, it would have been explicitly stated in its language. Furthermore, he noted how other constitutional amendments were written with explicit protections for African Americans which suggests they were meant to enjoy full protection under all parts of the Constitution including those related to bearing arms.

Opinion written by Justice NClifford
Decided: Feb 21, 1870
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms