Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Jonquille

1821 • 19 U.S. 452 • Marshall Court
The Jonquille was a Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that an American vessel could not be seized by French authorities for carrying goods from England to France. The ship had been stopped and searched by French officials, who claimed it violated their Navigation Act of 1778. However, the US argued that its Neutrality Proclamation of 1811 exempted them from such searches and seizures. The court ultimately sided with the US, ruling that since they were neutral in this conflict between...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1821
19 U.S. 452
5 L. Ed. 303
1821 U.S. LEXIS 365

The Jonquille

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Jonquille was a Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that an American vessel could not be seized by French authorities for carrying goods from England to France. The ship had been stopped and searched by French officials, who claimed it violated their Navigation Act of 1778. However, the US argued that its Neutrality Proclamation of 1811 exempted them from such searches and seizures. The court ultimately sided with the US, ruling that since they were neutral in this conflict between France and England, they should not be subject to either country's laws or regulations while on international waters. This decision established a precedent for protecting American vessels against foreign interference when sailing internationally.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The Jonquille, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a French vessel that had been captured by an American privateer during the Napoleonic Wars could be considered a prize of war. In his dissenting opinion, Justice Story argued that under international law and treaties between France and America at the time, such vessels were not subject to capture as prizes of war. He noted that although Congress had passed laws authorizing captures in certain circumstances, these laws did not apply to this case because they only applied when there was no treaty or other agreement between two nations governing such matters. Furthermore, he argued that even if Congress' laws did apply in this situation, they would still be invalid since they violated both international law and existing treaties between France and America. Ultimately Justice Story concluded that it would have been unjust for the court to allow a seizure which violated both domestic legislation as well as established principles of international law.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms