Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Josephine

1865 • 70 U.S. 83 • Chase Court
The Josephine was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1865. The case involved two vessels, the schooner Josephine and the bark Mary Elizabeth, which collided off of Cape Hatteras. The owners of both ships brought suit against each other for damages caused by the collision. In its decision, the court held that when two vessels collide at sea due to negligence on either side, they are jointly liable for any resulting damage or loss suffered as a result of their actions. This means...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1865
70 U.S. 83
18 L. Ed. 65
1865 U.S. LEXIS 688
Argued: Dec 11, 1865

The Josephine

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Josephine was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1865. The case involved two vessels, the schooner Josephine and the bark Mary Elizabeth, which collided off of Cape Hatteras. The owners of both ships brought suit against each other for damages caused by the collision. In its decision, the court held that when two vessels collide at sea due to negligence on either side, they are jointly liable for any resulting damage or loss suffered as a result of their actions. This means that if one vessel is found to be more negligent than another in causing an accident at sea then it must bear greater responsibility for any losses incurred from such an incident. Furthermore, this ruling established that even though there may have been contributory negligence on both sides prior to a collision occurring between two vessels at sea; only one party can ultimately be held responsible and thus liable for all damages sustained during such an event.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The Josephine, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a vessel that had been captured by Confederate forces during the Civil War and then recaptured by Union forces could be considered a prize of war. In an 8-1 decision, Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion arguing that since there was no evidence presented in court showing that at any point during its capture or recapture did it become property of either side, it should not be treated as a prize of war. He argued further that under international law vessels are only subject to seizure if they have actually been used for military purposes or are carrying contraband goods. Since neither condition applied here, he concluded that this vessel should not be considered a prize of war and thus must remain with its original owner.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms