Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Mary

1817 • 15 U.S. 123 • Marshall Court
The Mary was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1817. The dispute arose when two vessels, both named The Mary, collided off the coast of Massachusetts. Both ships were insured with different companies and each company sought to recover damages from the other for their respective losses. In its decision, the court held that where two vessels collide at sea due to negligence or fault on either side, there is no right of contribution between them as they are considered equal...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1817
15 U.S. 123
4 L. Ed. 200
1817 U.S. LEXIS 390
Argued: Feb 12, 1817

The Mary

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Mary was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1817. The dispute arose when two vessels, both named The Mary, collided off the coast of Massachusetts. Both ships were insured with different companies and each company sought to recover damages from the other for their respective losses. In its decision, the court held that where two vessels collide at sea due to negligence or fault on either side, there is no right of contribution between them as they are considered equal wrongdoers and therefore neither can seek compensation from one another. Furthermore, it was determined that if an insurance company pays out a claim due to such an incident then it has no recourse against any party involved in order to recoup those costs; instead they must bear this loss themselves. This ruling established important precedent regarding maritime collisions and liability for damages incurred during such events.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The Mary, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a ship that had been seized by French privateers during the Quasi-War with France could be considered an enemy vessel. Justice Story wrote a dissenting opinion in which he argued that the seizure of The Mary violated international law and should not have occurred. He noted that while it is true that war gives belligerents certain rights over neutral vessels, those rights are limited and do not include seizing ships without cause or for purposes other than preventing them from aiding their own country's enemies. Furthermore, since there was no declaration of war between France and America at this time, any such seizures were illegal under both American and international law. Therefore, Justice Story concluded that The Mary should never have been taken as an enemy vessel in the first place and its owners should be compensated for their losses accordingly.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms