Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Montello

• 1874 • 87 U.S. 430 • Waite Court
The Montello was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1873. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the steamship Montello and the owners of the steamship St. Lawrence. The Montello had been damaged by the St. Lawrence while the two ships were navigating the Mississippi River. The owners of the Montello sued the owners of the St. Lawrence for damages. The Supreme Court held that the owners of the Montello were entitled to damages from the owners of the St. Lawrence. The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1874
Docket: 30
87 U.S. 430
22 L. Ed. 391
1874 U.S. LEXIS 1432
Argued: Oct 21, 1874

The Montello

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Montello was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1873. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the steamship Montello and the owners of the steamship St. Lawrence. The Montello had been damaged by the St. Lawrence while the two ships were navigating the Mississippi River. The owners of the Montello sued the owners of the St. Lawrence for damages. The Supreme Court held that the owners of the Montello were entitled to damages from the owners of the St. Lawrence. The Court reasoned that the St. Lawrence had been negligent in its navigation of the river, and that the Montello had suffered damages as a result. The Court also held that the owners of the Montello were entitled to recover damages for the loss of the use of the ship while it was being repaired. The Court's decision established the principle that a vessel owner is entitled to recover damages for the loss of the use of the vessel while it is being repaired. This principle has been applied in numerous cases since the Montello decision.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The Montello was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court in 1873. The dispute arose when the steamboat Montello collided with another vessel, resulting in damages to both boats. The owners of the other boat sued for damages and argued that they should be compensated under admiralty law. However, Justice Field delivered a dissenting opinion which held that admiralty law did not apply because this collision occurred on an inland river rather than at sea or within navigable waters as defined by Congress. He further argued that even if it had been considered a maritime accident, there were no applicable statutes governing such matters since Congress had not yet passed any laws regarding collisions between vessels on rivers or lakes. As such, he concluded that state common law should govern instead of federal admiralty jurisdiction and thus denied compensation to the plaintiffs who owned the damaged vessel

Opinion written by Justice DDavis
Decided: Nov 23, 1874
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms