Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Neustra Senora De La Caridad -- Bages Et Al. Claimants

1819 • 17 U.S. 497 • Marshall Court
The Neustra Senora de La Caridad case involved a dispute between the Spanish and American governments over ownership of a shipwrecked vessel. The claimants, Bages et al., argued that they were entitled to salvage rights for recovering the cargo from the sunken vessel. The Supreme Court held that since Spain had not ceded its claim to Florida at the time of recovery, it was still considered Spanish territory and therefore subject to Spanish law. As such, any salvage rights would have been...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1819
17 U.S. 497
4 L. Ed. 624
1819 U.S. LEXIS 326

The Neustra Senora De La Caridad -- Bages Et Al. Claimants

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Neustra Senora de La Caridad case involved a dispute between the Spanish and American governments over ownership of a shipwrecked vessel. The claimants, Bages et al., argued that they were entitled to salvage rights for recovering the cargo from the sunken vessel. The Supreme Court held that since Spain had not ceded its claim to Florida at the time of recovery, it was still considered Spanish territory and therefore subject to Spanish law. As such, any salvage rights would have been granted by Spain rather than by U.S courts or laws. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of Spain's right to control all property within its borders and denied Bages et al.'s claims for salvage rights on this basis.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of The Neustra Senora de La Caridad - Bages et al. Claimants, the dissenting opinion was that Congress had no authority to pass a law which would grant compensation for property taken by Spain prior to cession of Florida in 1819. Justice Story argued that such an act violated Article I Section 10 Clause 1 of the Constitution, which states "No State shall…pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law." He further stated that even if it were within Congress' power to pass such a law, they could not do so without violating international obligations and treaties between Spain and America. Furthermore, he argued that granting compensation for property taken before cession would be unfair as it would benefit some claimants more than others based on when their claims arose. In conclusion Justice Story believed this bill should have been struck down as unconstitutional because it exceeded Congressional authority and violated both domestic laws and international agreements.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms