Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The New Orleans

• 1882 • 106 U.S. 13 • Waite Court
The New Orleans, 106 U.S. 13 was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1882. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the steamboat, The New Orleans, and the owners of the steamboat, The City of New Orleans. The owners of The New Orleans claimed that the owners of The City of New Orleans had wrongfully taken possession of The New Orleans and refused to return it. The owners of The City of New Orleans argued that they had a right to take possession of The New Orleans...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1882
Docket: 53
106 U.S. 13
1 S. Ct. 90
27 L. Ed. 96
1882 U.S. LEXIS 1510
Argued: Oct 26, 1882

The New Orleans

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The New Orleans, 106 U.S. 13 was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1882. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the steamboat, The New Orleans, and the owners of the steamboat, The City of New Orleans. The owners of The New Orleans claimed that the owners of The City of New Orleans had wrongfully taken possession of The New Orleans and refused to return it. The owners of The City of New Orleans argued that they had a right to take possession of The New Orleans because they had a valid lien on the vessel. The Supreme Court held that the owners of The City of New Orleans did not have a valid lien on The New Orleans and that the owners of The New Orleans were entitled to the return of their vessel. The Court reasoned that the lien was invalid because it was not properly recorded in the proper public records. The Court also held that the owners of The City of New Orleans had wrongfully taken possession of The New Orleans and were liable for damages. The New Orleans, 106 U.S. 13 is an important case because it established the principle that liens must be properly recorded in the proper public records in order to be valid. This case also established that wrongful taking of possession of a vessel is actionable and that the owners of the vessel are entitled to damages.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of The New Orleans, a majority opinion was issued by the United States Supreme Court. However, Justice Field dissented from this opinion and argued that the city of New Orleans had no authority to impose taxes on vessels entering its port. He reasoned that Congress had exclusive power over interstate commerce and any attempt by a state or municipality to interfere with it was unconstitutional. Furthermore, he noted that while states have certain powers under their police regulations they cannot use those powers in such a way as to impede upon federal laws governing interstate commerce. In conclusion, Justice Field believed that since Congress has exclusive control over navigation between states any attempts by local governments to tax vessels would be an infringement on congressional power and therefore unconstitutional.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Nov 06, 1882
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms