Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Nitro-glycerine Case.; Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co

• 1872 • 82 U.S. 524 • Chase Court
The Nitro-Glycerine Case, Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co., was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1872. The case involved a shipment of nitro-glycerine, a highly volatile explosive, that was sent by Wells, Fargo & Co. from San Francisco to Virginia City, Nevada. The shipment was damaged in transit, and the nitro-glycerine exploded, causing extensive property damage and the death of several people. The case was brought by the owner of the damaged property, Parrot, who sued...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1872
82 U.S. 524
21 L. Ed. 206
1872 U.S. LEXIS 1280
Argued: Mar 14, 1873

The Nitro-glycerine Case.; Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Nitro-Glycerine Case, Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co., was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1872. The case involved a shipment of nitro-glycerine, a highly volatile explosive, that was sent by Wells, Fargo & Co. from San Francisco to Virginia City, Nevada. The shipment was damaged in transit, and the nitro-glycerine exploded, causing extensive property damage and the death of several people. The case was brought by the owner of the damaged property, Parrot, who sued Wells, Fargo & Co. for negligence. The Supreme Court held that Wells, Fargo & Co. was liable for the damages caused by the nitro-glycerine, even though the company had taken reasonable precautions to ensure the safety of the shipment. The Court reasoned that the company had a duty to exercise the highest degree of care in handling the shipment, given the dangerous nature of the cargo. The Nitro-Glycerine Case established the principle that carriers of dangerous goods have a duty to exercise the highest degree of care in handling such shipments. This principle has been applied in numerous cases since then, and is still used today to determine the liability of carriers for damages caused by dangerous goods.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co., the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a carrier could be held liable for damages caused by an explosive shipment they had transported. The majority opinion found that carriers were not responsible for any damage caused by dangerous goods, as long as they took reasonable care in handling them and warned customers about potential risks associated with such shipments. However, Justice Field dissented from this opinion and argued that carriers should be held strictly liable for any harm resulting from their transportation of explosives regardless of how much caution was taken or warnings given to customers. He believed that because these items are inherently dangerous, it is impossible to guarantee safety when transporting them and thus companies must bear full responsibility if anything goes wrong during transit.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Mar 31, 1873
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms