Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Schooner Adeline And Cargo

1815 • 13 U.S. 244 • Marshall Court
The Schooner Adeline and Cargo was a Supreme Court case that revolved around the issue of whether or not a foreign vessel could be seized by an American privateer in time of war. The court ruled against the seizure, finding that it violated international law. The ruling established important precedent for future cases involving maritime seizures during wartime. At the heart of this decision was Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion on neutral vessels being exempt from capture under certain...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1815
13 U.S. 244
3 L. Ed. 719
1815 U.S. LEXIS 390

The Schooner Adeline And Cargo

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Schooner Adeline and Cargo was a Supreme Court case that revolved around the issue of whether or not a foreign vessel could be seized by an American privateer in time of war. The court ruled against the seizure, finding that it violated international law. The ruling established important precedent for future cases involving maritime seizures during wartime. At the heart of this decision was Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion on neutral vessels being exempt from capture under certain circumstances, even if they were carrying contraband goods to enemy ports. This decision set forth principles which would later become known as "the rule of free ships making free goods." In essence, this meant that any cargo belonging to neutrals should remain safe from capture unless it is actually destined for an enemy port or contains contraband material itself. Ultimately, this case helped define how nations interact with each other at sea during times of conflict and provided clarity regarding what constitutes lawful behavior when dealing with neutral vessels in wartime situations.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The Schooner Adeline and Cargo, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a French vessel that had been captured by an American privateer during the war of 1812 could be lawfully condemned as prize. Justice Story wrote a dissenting opinion in which he argued that under international law, it would have been illegal for the United States to capture this particular ship because it was sailing from one neutral port to another at the time of its seizure. He further noted that even if such captures were permissible under international law, they should not be allowed in domestic courts unless authorized by Congress or some other competent authority. In his view, since no such authorization existed here, condemnation of this vessel as prize would violate both public policy and justice. As a result, Justice Story concluded that any judgment against her must be reversed and she should instead be restored with all damages paid for her wrongful detention.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms