Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Siren

• 1871 • 80 U.S. 389 • Chase Court
The Siren was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1871. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the steamship Siren and the owners of the steamship City of New York. The Siren had been damaged in a collision with the City of New York, and the owners of the Siren sought to recover damages from the owners of the City of New York. The Supreme Court held that the owners of the Siren were entitled to recover damages from the owners of the City of New York. The Court found...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1871
80 U.S. 389
20 L. Ed. 505
1871 U.S. LEXIS 1352

The Siren

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Siren was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1871. The case involved a dispute between the owners of the steamship Siren and the owners of the steamship City of New York. The Siren had been damaged in a collision with the City of New York, and the owners of the Siren sought to recover damages from the owners of the City of New York. The Supreme Court held that the owners of the Siren were entitled to recover damages from the owners of the City of New York. The Court found that the owners of the City of New York had been negligent in the operation of their vessel, and that the negligence had caused the collision. The Court also held that the owners of the Siren had acted reasonably in attempting to avoid the collision, and that they were therefore entitled to recover damages. The Court also held that the owners of the City of New York were liable for the damages caused by the collision, regardless of whether the owners of the Siren had acted reasonably in attempting to avoid the collision. This ruling established the principle of strict liability for damages caused by collisions between vessels. This principle has been applied in many subsequent cases involving collisions between vessels.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The Siren, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a ship's captain had the right to detain and search another vessel on suspicion of piracy. In an 8-1 decision, the court ruled that he did not have such authority. Justice Field wrote a dissenting opinion in which he argued that it is within a captain's power to take action against suspected pirates if there are reasonable grounds for believing they are engaged in illegal activity. He further stated that this power should be exercised with caution and only when necessary, but nonetheless exists as part of his duty to protect those under his command from harm or danger. Field also noted that while Congress has enacted laws regarding piracy, these do not supersede common law principles allowing captains to act on their own initiative when faced with imminent peril at sea.

Opinion written by Justice NHSwayne
Decided: Dec 18, 1871
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms