Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The United States, Plaintiffs, v. James And John G. Daniel, Executors Of Beverly Daniel, Late U.s. Marshal

1848 • 47 U.S. 11 • Taney Court
The United States brought a case against James and John G. Daniel, Executors of Beverly Daniel, late U.S. Marshal for the District of Columbia in 1848. The government alleged that the executors had failed to pay over certain moneys collected by their predecessor as marshal which were due to the United States under an act of Congress passed on March 3rd 1843 entitled "An Act Making Appropriations for Sundry Civil Expenses". The Supreme Court found in favor of the Government and ordered that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1848
47 U.S. 11
12 L. Ed. 323
1848 U.S. LEXIS 291
Argued: Dec 08, 1847

The United States, Plaintiffs, v. James And John G. Daniel, Executors Of Beverly Daniel, Late U.s. Marshal

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The United States brought a case against James and John G. Daniel, Executors of Beverly Daniel, late U.S. Marshal for the District of Columbia in 1848. The government alleged that the executors had failed to pay over certain moneys collected by their predecessor as marshal which were due to the United States under an act of Congress passed on March 3rd 1843 entitled "An Act Making Appropriations for Sundry Civil Expenses". The Supreme Court found in favor of the Government and ordered that judgment be entered against them for $2,845 plus interest from December 1st 1844 until paid with costs taxed at $20.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the United States v. James and John G. Daniel, Executors of Beverly Daniel, late U.S. Marshal case, Justice McLean delivered a dissenting opinion arguing that the executors should not be held liable for any debt incurred by their predecessor in office as it was beyond their control or authority to do so. He argued that when an officer is appointed to a position they are only responsible for acts done within the scope of their duties while in office and cannot be held accountable for debts contracted prior to taking up such post nor can they be made personally liable after leaving it unless there has been some fraud or misconduct on behalf of said officer during his tenure which would render him personally responsible even after he leaves office. In this particular case, no evidence had been presented showing any fraudulent activity on behalf of Beverly Daniel thus making his successors not legally obligated to pay off any outstanding debt left behind by him upon his death since they were never parties thereto nor did they have knowledge thereof at the time of assuming office; therefore Justice McLean concluded that judgment should not go against them but rather remain with those who originally contracted with Mr Daniel before he passed away from this world

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms