Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Levy, Administratrix v. Louisiana Through The Charity Hospital Of Louisiana At New Orleans Board Of Administrators Et Al.

• 1967 • 391 U.S. 68 • Warren Court
In the 1967 case of Levy v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that illegitimate children cannot be denied equal protection under the law as per the Fourteenth Amendment. The case was brought by a mother on behalf of her five illegitimate children after their father's death due to alleged negligence at Charity Hospital in New Orleans, Louisiana. The hospital argued that under state law, only legitimate children could claim damages for wrongful death of a parent and thus dismissed her suit....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1967
Docket: 508
391 U.S. 68
88 S. Ct. 1509
20 L. Ed. 2d 436
1968 U.S. LEXIS 1629
Argued: Mar 27, 1968

Levy, Administratrix v. Louisiana Through The Charity Hospital Of Louisiana At New Orleans Board Of Administrators Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1967 case of Levy v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that illegitimate children cannot be denied equal protection under the law as per the Fourteenth Amendment. The case was brought by a mother on behalf of her five illegitimate children after their father's death due to alleged negligence at Charity Hospital in New Orleans, Louisiana. The hospital argued that under state law, only legitimate children could claim damages for wrongful death of a parent and thus dismissed her suit. However, in a unanimous decision led by Justice Douglas, it was held that this distinction violated equal protection rights guaranteed by Constitution because "illegitimacy is analogous to 'accident of birth'". Therefore, denying these rights based on legitimacy status would be unjustifiable discrimination.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Levy v. Louisiana, Justice Harlan argued that the majority's decision to extend equal protection rights to illegitimate children was an overreach of judicial authority. He contended that it is not within the purview of courts to determine social policy or dictate how states should classify individuals in their laws. Instead, he believed such decisions should be left up to legislative bodies who are better equipped and authorized to make these determinations based on societal norms and values at any given time. In his view, while there may be compelling reasons for treating legitimate and illegitimate children differently under certain circumstances, it is not a matter for courts but rather legislatures to decide upon.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: May 20, 1968
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms