Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Kleppe, Secretary Of The Interior v. Delta Mining, Inc., Et Al.

• 1975 • 423 U.S. 403 • Burger Court
In the case of Kleppe v. Delta Mining Inc., 1975, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the federal government has complete power over public lands and can protect wild horses and burros from capture or harm under the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971. The court held that Congress had authority to enact this legislation under its constitutional powers to regulate property belonging to the United States. The decision came after a group of mining companies challenged this law...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1975
Docket: 74-521
423 U.S. 403
96 S. Ct. 816
46 L. Ed. 2d 591
1976 U.S. LEXIS 114
Argued: Oct 06, 1975

Kleppe, Secretary Of The Interior v. Delta Mining, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Kleppe v. Delta Mining Inc., 1975, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the federal government has complete power over public lands and can protect wild horses and burros from capture or harm under the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971. The court held that Congress had authority to enact this legislation under its constitutional powers to regulate property belonging to the United States. The decision came after a group of mining companies challenged this law arguing it was an unconstitutional exercise of Congressional power since there was no proof these animals were endangered nor did they cross state lines, thus not affecting interstate commerce. However, their argument was rejected by both lower courts and finally by Supreme Court which affirmed that protection for these animals on public land fell within Congress's purview as "property" manager.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Kleppe v. Delta Mining, Inc., Justice Thurgood Marshall argued that the majority's interpretation of the Property Clause was overly broad and gave too much power to Congress. He contended that while Congress has authority over federal lands, it should not extend to regulation of all private activities on those lands without a clear connection to federal interests. Marshall also disagreed with the majority's view that courts should defer completely to Congressional judgment in these matters; he believed judicial review is necessary when there are allegations of Constitutional violations or exceeding statutory authority. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential abuse of this expanded power by future administrations and its impact on state sovereignty.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Jan 26, 1976
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms