Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Thomas v. Review Board Of The Indiana Employment Security Division Et Al.

• 1980 • 450 U.S. 707 • Burger Court
In Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division et al., 1980, Eddie C. Thomas was a Jehovah's Witness who quit his job because he believed that his work in an armament factory was against his religious principles. After quitting, he applied for unemployment compensation but was denied by the Indiana Employment Security Division on grounds that he left voluntarily without good cause and thus ineligible under state law. The case reached the Supreme Court which ruled in favor...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1980
Docket: 79-952
450 U.S. 707
101 S. Ct. 1425
67 L. Ed. 2d 624
1981 U.S. LEXIS 11
Argued: Oct 07, 1980

Thomas v. Review Board Of The Indiana Employment Security Division Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division et al., 1980, Eddie C. Thomas was a Jehovah's Witness who quit his job because he believed that his work in an armament factory was against his religious principles. After quitting, he applied for unemployment compensation but was denied by the Indiana Employment Security Division on grounds that he left voluntarily without good cause and thus ineligible under state law. The case reached the Supreme Court which ruled in favor of Thomas with a 9-0 decision stating that denying him benefits violated his First Amendment rights to free exercise of religion as protected by the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause. The court held that states cannot force individuals to choose between their jobs and their religious beliefs unless there is proof of compelling state interest, which wasn't demonstrated here.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, there was no formal dissenting opinion issued by any justice. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Thomas, with all justices agreeing that his religious beliefs were sincerely held and thus should be protected under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause. Therefore, he was entitled to unemployment benefits after quitting his job due to a conflict between his work duties and religious beliefs as a Jehovah’s Witness.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Apr 06, 1981
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms