Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Thompson, Trustee, v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. Et Al.

• 1939 • 309 U.S. 478 • Hughes Court
In the case of Thompson, Trustee v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. et al., 1939, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether a bankruptcy trustee could recover payments made by an insolvent debtor during a period of insolvency as preferential transfers under Section 60(b) and (c) of the Bankruptcy Act. The debtor in question had purchased gas from Magnolia on credit while insolvent and later paid for it within four months before filing for bankruptcy. The court ruled that these payments were...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1939
Docket: 481
309 U.S. 478
60 S. Ct. 628
84 L. Ed. 876
1940 U.S. LEXIS 1045
Argued: Feb 28, 1940

Thompson, Trustee, v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Thompson, Trustee v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. et al., 1939, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether a bankruptcy trustee could recover payments made by an insolvent debtor during a period of insolvency as preferential transfers under Section 60(b) and (c) of the Bankruptcy Act. The debtor in question had purchased gas from Magnolia on credit while insolvent and later paid for it within four months before filing for bankruptcy. The court ruled that these payments were not preferential transfers because they were made in the ordinary course of business and did not result in any depletion of assets available to other creditors at the time when payment was made since new value was given by Magnolia after each payment which replenished or increased estate's assets.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Thompson, Trustee v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., Justice Black disagreed with the majority's decision that a bankruptcy trustee could not recover payments made by an insolvent debtor to its creditors within four months of filing for bankruptcy if those payments were considered preferential transfers under state law. The dissent argued that this interpretation was inconsistent with the purpose and language of federal bankruptcy laws, which aimed to ensure equal distribution among all creditors rather than allowing certain preferred creditors to receive more than their fair share at the expense of others. Furthermore, it contended that such a ruling would undermine confidence in commercial transactions because it allowed debtors on the brink of insolvency to favor some creditors over others without any legal repercussions.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Mar 25, 1940
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms