Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Thompson v. Maxwell

• 1877 • 95 U.S. 391 • Waite Court
Thompson v. Maxwell is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1877. The case involved a dispute between two parties over the ownership of a piece of land in the state of Arkansas. The plaintiff, Thompson, claimed that he had purchased the land from the defendant, Maxwell, in 1871. Maxwell, however, argued that he had never sold the land to Thompson and that he was still the rightful owner. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with Thompson, ruling that he was the rightful owner...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1877
95 U.S. 391
24 L. Ed. 481
1877 U.S. LEXIS 2186
Argued: Nov 14, 1877

Thompson v. Maxwell

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Thompson v. Maxwell is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1877. The case involved a dispute between two parties over the ownership of a piece of land in the state of Arkansas. The plaintiff, Thompson, claimed that he had purchased the land from the defendant, Maxwell, in 1871. Maxwell, however, argued that he had never sold the land to Thompson and that he was still the rightful owner. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with Thompson, ruling that he was the rightful owner of the land. The Court found that Thompson had provided sufficient evidence to prove that he had purchased the land from Maxwell in 1871. The Court also found that Maxwell had failed to provide any evidence to support his claim that he had never sold the land. As a result, the Court held that Thompson was the rightful owner of the land and that Maxwell had no legal right to it.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Thompson v. Maxwell, arguing that the majority's decision was incorrect and should be reversed. He argued that a contract between two parties is binding on both of them, regardless of whether one party had knowledge or not at the time they entered into it. Furthermore, he stated that if one party has been misled by another as to any material fact which affects their rights under the contract then they may have grounds for rescission or damages but cannot void an otherwise valid agreement simply because of lack of knowledge about some minor detail. In this case, Justice Field believed there was no evidence presented to show that either party had been misled regarding any material facts and thus concluded that neither could avoid their obligations under the contract without being held liable for breach thereof.

Opinion written by Justice JPBradley
Decided: Dec 03, 1877
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms