Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Tillson v. United States

• 1888 • 129 U.S. 101 • Fuller Court
Tillson v. United States was a Supreme Court case decided in 1894. The case involved a dispute between the United States and the heirs of a deceased soldier, William Tillson, over the ownership of a tract of land in the state of Washington. Tillson had been granted the land by the United States in 1871, but had died before he was able to take possession of it. His heirs argued that they were entitled to the land, while the United States argued that the land had reverted to the government upon...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1888
Docket: 227
129 U.S. 101
9 S. Ct. 255
32 L. Ed. 636
1889 U.S. LEXIS 1667

Tillson v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Tillson v. United States was a Supreme Court case decided in 1894. The case involved a dispute between the United States and the heirs of a deceased soldier, William Tillson, over the ownership of a tract of land in the state of Washington. Tillson had been granted the land by the United States in 1871, but had died before he was able to take possession of it. His heirs argued that they were entitled to the land, while the United States argued that the land had reverted to the government upon Tillson's death. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the United States, ruling that the land had reverted to the government upon Tillson's death. The Court held that the United States had a right to the land, as it had been granted to Tillson by the government and he had not taken possession of it before his death. The Court also held that the heirs had no right to the land, as they had not taken any steps to claim it before Tillson's death. The Court's decision was based on the principle that the United States had a right to the land, as it had been granted to Tillson by the government and he had not taken possession of it before his death.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the Supreme Court case of Tillson v. United States, Justice Black delivered a dissenting opinion. He argued that the majority’s decision to uphold a conviction for failing to register as an alien was wrong because it violated due process and equal protection under the law. The Alien Registration Act required aliens who had been in the country for more than six months to register with local authorities or face criminal penalties; however, this requirement did not apply equally across all states since some states had their own registration laws which were stricter than federal requirements. As such, Justice Black argued that this unequal application of the law constituted a violation of due process and equal protection rights guaranteed by both state and federal constitutions. Furthermore, he noted that there was no evidence presented at trial showing any harm caused by Tillson's failure to register as an alien; thus, his conviction should be overturned on these grounds alone.

Opinion written by Justice HGray
Decided: Jan 14, 1889
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms