Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Tilton Et Al. v. Richardson, Secretary Of Health, Education, And Welfare, Et Al.

• 1970 • 403 U.S. 672 • Burger Court
In Tilton v. Richardson, 1970, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a case concerning federal funding to religiously affiliated educational institutions. The plaintiffs argued that providing construction grants to such colleges and universities violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment which prohibits government establishment of religion. However, in an 8-1 decision, the court held that these grants did not violate this clause as they were part of a larger secular program aimed at...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1970
Docket: 153
403 U.S. 672
91 S. Ct. 2091
29 L. Ed. 2d 790
1971 U.S. LEXIS 20
Argued: Mar 02, 1971

Tilton Et Al. v. Richardson, Secretary Of Health, Education, And Welfare, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Tilton v. Richardson, 1970, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a case concerning federal funding to religiously affiliated educational institutions. The plaintiffs argued that providing construction grants to such colleges and universities violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment which prohibits government establishment of religion. However, in an 8-1 decision, the court held that these grants did not violate this clause as they were part of a larger secular program aimed at assisting higher education facilities regardless of their affiliations or lack thereof with any religious body. The funds provided could only be used for buildings intended for non-religious use and thus did not promote any particular faith or belief system over another one; rather it was seen as neutral assistance by the state towards all forms of higher learning institutions including those with some form of religious affiliation.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Tilton v. Richardson, Justice William O. Douglas argued that providing federal funds to religiously affiliated colleges and universities violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. He contended that these institutions were inherently religious in nature and thus any financial aid would inevitably support their religious activities, regardless of whether it was intended for secular purposes such as constructing buildings or improving facilities. Furthermore, he believed there was no effective way to ensure that federally funded facilities would not be used for religious instruction or worship in future years after government restrictions expired. Therefore, he concluded this form of state assistance constituted an unconstitutional endorsement and promotion of religion by the government.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Jun 28, 1971
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms