Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Titus v. United States

• 1874 • 87 U.S. 475 • Waite Court
Titus v. United States was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether a defendant could be convicted of a crime if the indictment failed to allege an essential element of the offense. The case involved a man named Titus who was charged with the crime of embezzlement. The indictment failed to allege that the money was taken from the United States, which was an essential element of the crime. The Supreme Court held that the indictment was insufficient and that Titus...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1874
Docket: 18
87 U.S. 475
22 L. Ed. 400
1874 U.S. LEXIS 1435
Argued: Nov 12, 1874

Titus v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Titus v. United States was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether a defendant could be convicted of a crime if the indictment failed to allege an essential element of the offense. The case involved a man named Titus who was charged with the crime of embezzlement. The indictment failed to allege that the money was taken from the United States, which was an essential element of the crime. The Supreme Court held that the indictment was insufficient and that Titus could not be convicted of the crime. The Court reasoned that the indictment must allege all of the essential elements of the crime in order to be valid. The Court also held that the indictment must be specific enough to inform the defendant of the charges against him. The Court concluded that the indictment in this case was insufficient and that Titus could not be convicted of the crime.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Titus v. United States, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a defendant could be convicted of embezzlement for taking money from his employer that he believed to be due him as wages. The majority opinion held that the defendant's belief did not matter and that it was sufficient for conviction if the jury found beyond a reasonable doubt that he had taken property belonging to another without permission or authority. In dissent, Justice Field argued that since there were no allegations of fraud or deceit in this case, it should have been left up to the jury to decide whether or not they believed the defendant acted under an honest belief in his right to take possession of what he thought were unpaid wages owed by his employer. He further stated that even though such beliefs may have been mistaken, they should still be considered when deciding guilt or innocence because punishing someone who honestly believes their actions are justified is contrary to natural justice and would lead people into believing they can never rely on their own judgment but must always defer instead only upon legal advice before acting on any issue involving potential criminal liability.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Nov 30, 1874
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms