Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Tomlinson v. Jessup

• 1872 • 82 U.S. 454 • Chase Court
Tomlinson v. Jessup was a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1872. The case involved a dispute between two parties over a contract for the sale of a steamboat. The plaintiff, Tomlinson, had entered into a contract with the defendant, Jessup, to purchase a steamboat for $2,000. Tomlinson paid the full amount, but Jessup refused to deliver the boat. Tomlinson then sued Jessup for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid and enforceable. The Court...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1872
82 U.S. 454
21 L. Ed. 204
1872 U.S. LEXIS 1274
Argued: Feb 14, 1873

Tomlinson v. Jessup

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Tomlinson v. Jessup was a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1872. The case involved a dispute between two parties over a contract for the sale of a steamboat. The plaintiff, Tomlinson, had entered into a contract with the defendant, Jessup, to purchase a steamboat for $2,000. Tomlinson paid the full amount, but Jessup refused to deliver the boat. Tomlinson then sued Jessup for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid and enforceable. The Court found that the contract was supported by consideration, meaning that both parties had given something of value in exchange for the other's promise. The Court also found that the contract was not void for lack of mutuality, meaning that both parties had an obligation to perform under the contract. The Court held that Jessup was liable for breach of contract and ordered him to deliver the steamboat to Tomlinson. The Court also ordered Jessup to pay damages to Tomlinson for the breach. This case established the principle that a contract is valid and enforceable if it is supported by consideration and mutuality.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Tomlinson v. Jessup, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a contract between two parties could be enforced when one of them had died before it was fully executed. The majority opinion held that the contract in question could not be enforced because it had not been completed prior to the death of one party; however, Justice Field dissented from this ruling. He argued that contracts should generally remain enforceable even if they are incomplete at the time of death and noted that such an interpretation would encourage people to enter into binding agreements without fear of their being rendered invalid due to unforeseen circumstances like death or disability. Furthermore, he suggested that allowing for enforcement in these cases would provide greater certainty and stability within commercial transactions by ensuring all parties involved can rely on their contractual obligations being upheld regardless of any intervening events which may occur during performance.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Mar 31, 1873
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms