Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Tony And Susan Alamo Foundation Et Al. v. Secretary Of Labor

• 1984 • 471 U.S. 290 • Burger Court
The Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor case in 1984 revolved around the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and whether it applied to workers at a religious foundation who were not paid for their labor but received other benefits. The Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation, a non-profit religious organization, operated various commercial businesses staffed by associates of the foundation who did not receive wages but were provided with food, clothing, shelter, and other necessities. The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1984
Docket: 83-1935
471 U.S. 290
105 S. Ct. 1953
85 L. Ed. 2d 278
1985 U.S. LEXIS 3
Argued: Mar 25, 1985

Tony And Susan Alamo Foundation Et Al. v. Secretary Of Labor

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor case in 1984 revolved around the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and whether it applied to workers at a religious foundation who were not paid for their labor but received other benefits. The Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation, a non-profit religious organization, operated various commercial businesses staffed by associates of the foundation who did not receive wages but were provided with food, clothing, shelter, and other necessities. The U.S Department of Labor sued the foundation arguing that these associates should be considered employees under FLSA thus entitled to minimum wage and overtime pay. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Department of Labor stating that despite being a religious organization or providing basic needs as compensation does not exempt an entity from compliance with labor laws such as FLSA if they engage in ordinary commercial activities.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor, Justice Powell argued that the majority's decision failed to consider the unique nature of religious organizations and their volunteers. He contended that applying labor laws to these individuals could infringe upon their First Amendment rights by interfering with religious practices. Furthermore, he expressed concern about how this ruling might affect other volunteer-based organizations beyond just religious ones. He also disagreed with the majority's view on what constitutes a "volunteer," arguing that it should be based on an individual’s intent rather than any benefits they may receive in return for their service.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Apr 23, 1985
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms