Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Torres v. Puerto Rico

• 1978 • 442 U.S. 465 • Burger Court
In the Torres v. Puerto Rico case of 1978, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a Puerto Rican statute authorizing police to search any person, baggage or package in public places without probable cause was unconstitutional. The court held that this law violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. This decision came after appellant Angel Torres challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana which was found during such a warrantless search upon his...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1978
Docket: 77-1609
442 U.S. 465
99 S. Ct. 2425
61 L. Ed. 2d 1
1979 U.S. LEXIS 111
Argued: Jan 10, 1979

Torres v. Puerto Rico

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Torres v. Puerto Rico case of 1978, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a Puerto Rican statute authorizing police to search any person, baggage or package in public places without probable cause was unconstitutional. The court held that this law violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. This decision came after appellant Angel Torres challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana which was found during such a warrantless search upon his arrival at San Juan Airport from New York City. The court emphasized that even though Puerto Rico is an unincorporated territory of the United States, its residents are still protected by most aspects of the U.S Constitution including Bill Of Rights protections.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Torres v. Puerto Rico, Justice Rehnquist disagreed with the majority's view that Fourth Amendment protections should extend to searches and seizures by local law enforcement in Puerto Rico. He argued that this interpretation was inconsistent with previous rulings which had held that these constitutional safeguards did not apply to territories unless specifically incorporated by Congress. Furthermore, he contended that there were practical reasons why such protections might not be appropriate or necessary in all U.S territories due to their unique legal and cultural contexts. Therefore, he believed it was up to Congress rather than the courts to decide whether these rights should be extended.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Jun 18, 1979
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms