Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Toussie v. United States

• 1969 • 397 U.S. 112 • Burger Court
In the 1969 case of Toussie v. United States, Robert Toussie was charged with failing to register for the draft during a specified period in 1951 when he turned eighteen years old. The government did not indict him until more than five years later, and he argued that this delay violated a federal statute of limitations which states that any offense must be prosecuted within five years. The Supreme Court agreed with Toussie's argument, ruling in his favor by holding that failure to register for...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1969
Docket: 441
397 U.S. 112
90 S. Ct. 858
25 L. Ed. 2d 156
1970 U.S. LEXIS 96
Argued: Jan 14, 1970

Toussie v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1969 case of Toussie v. United States, Robert Toussie was charged with failing to register for the draft during a specified period in 1951 when he turned eighteen years old. The government did not indict him until more than five years later, and he argued that this delay violated a federal statute of limitations which states that any offense must be prosecuted within five years. The Supreme Court agreed with Toussie's argument, ruling in his favor by holding that failure to register for the draft is not an ongoing crime but rather one discrete act; therefore, it falls under the standard statute of limitations rule requiring prosecution within five years from when such an act occurs.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Toussie v. United States, Justice Black disagreed with the majority's interpretation of the statute of limitations in relation to draft evasion cases. He argued that Congress intended a five-year limitation period on prosecutions for failure to register for the draft and that this should start from when an individual reaches 26 years old - not from their initial obligation to register at age 18 as suggested by the majority. Justice Black contended that if Congress had wanted a different outcome, they would have explicitly stated so in legislation. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential abuses of power by prosecutors who could delay bringing charges until evidence or witnesses were no longer available to defendants. In his view, such delays could undermine fair trials and due process rights.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Mar 02, 1970
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms