Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp. Et Al.

• 1983 • 466 U.S. 243 • Burger Court
In the 1983 case of Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding an international air carrier's liability for lost cargo under the Warsaw Convention - an international treaty that governs certain aspects of commercial air travel. The Franklin Mint Corporation had shipped goods via Trans World Airlines (TWA), but some were lost in transit and others arrived damaged, leading to a lawsuit by Franklin Mint against TWA for compensation beyond...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1983
Docket: 82-1186
466 U.S. 243
104 S. Ct. 1776
80 L. Ed. 2d 273
1984 U.S. LEXIS 58
Argued: Nov 30, 1983

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1983 case of Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding an international air carrier's liability for lost cargo under the Warsaw Convention - an international treaty that governs certain aspects of commercial air travel. The Franklin Mint Corporation had shipped goods via Trans World Airlines (TWA), but some were lost in transit and others arrived damaged, leading to a lawsuit by Franklin Mint against TWA for compensation beyond what was stipulated as maximum liability under Article 22(2) of the Warsaw Convention. The main issue before the court was whether "other damages" referred to in Article 18 could include consequential damages resulting from loss or damage to cargo, thereby allowing claimants like Franklin Mint to seek compensation beyond limits set by Article 22(2). In its decision, however, the Supreme Court held that such consequential damages are not recoverable under Articles 18 and 22(2) of this convention. This ruling effectively limited airlines' liabilities for lost or damaged goods during international carriage by air according to terms specified within these articles of Warsaw Convention.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp., Justice Blackmun argued that the majority's interpretation of Article 18(3) of the Warsaw Convention was incorrect and inconsistent with its purpose and history. He contended that this provision should not be interpreted to limit liability only in cases where an airline has taken all necessary measures to avoid damage; instead, it should apply whenever an event beyond the carrier's control causes damage. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority’s view on how U.S courts have historically handled these issues under international law conventions like Warsaw Convention - arguing they had been more flexible than what majority suggested. Finally, he expressed concern about potential negative implications of ruling for future cases involving air carriers' liabilities under international agreements.

Opinion written by Justice SDOConnor
Decided: Apr 17, 1984
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms