Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Treat, Treasurer Of Coconino County, Arizona, v. Grand Canyon Railway Company

• 1911 • 222 U.S. 448 • White Court
In the case of Treat, Treasurer of Coconino County, Arizona v. Grand Canyon Railway Company in 1911, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding taxation. The Grand Canyon Railway Company had been assessed for taxes by Coconino County based on its property value which included franchises granted by Congress and territorial legislatures. The railway company argued that these franchises were not taxable under Arizona law because they were intangible assets and therefore should be excluded from...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1911
Docket: 86
222 U.S. 448
32 S. Ct. 125
56 L. Ed. 265
1912 U.S. LEXIS 2196
Argued: Dec 08, 1911

Treat, Treasurer Of Coconino County, Arizona, v. Grand Canyon Railway Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Treat, Treasurer of Coconino County, Arizona v. Grand Canyon Railway Company in 1911, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding taxation. The Grand Canyon Railway Company had been assessed for taxes by Coconino County based on its property value which included franchises granted by Congress and territorial legislatures. The railway company argued that these franchises were not taxable under Arizona law because they were intangible assets and therefore should be excluded from their property's valuation for tax purposes. The Supreme Court disagreed with this argument stating that while it was true that franchises are generally considered intangible assets, when used in connection with tangible property to generate income (as was the case here), they become part of the overall value of said tangible property and thus can be taxed accordingly. Therefore, according to this ruling, even though a franchise is an intangible asset per se; if it contributes to increasing the worth or profitability of physical properties owned by a corporation or business entity then such franchise becomes taxable as well.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Treat, Treasurer of Coconino County, Arizona v. Grand Canyon Railway Company (1911), Justice Holmes argued that the majority's decision was based on a misinterpretation of both state and federal law. He contended that under Arizona law at the time, taxes were not considered personal debt but rather an obligation tied to property ownership. Therefore, he reasoned that when Grand Canyon Railway Company purchased land from another company already in arrears on its tax payments, it also assumed responsibility for those unpaid taxes as part of its new property ownership obligations. Furthermore, Holmes disagreed with the majority's interpretation of federal legislation granting lands to railroads; he believed this legislation did not exempt these companies from local taxation responsibilities or protect them from inheriting past due taxes associated with their newly acquired properties.

Opinion written by Justice OWHolmes
Decided: Jan 09, 1912
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms