Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Turner Et Al. v. Fouche Et Al.

• 1969 • 396 U.S. 346 • Burger Court
In Turner et al. v. Fouche et al., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Georgia county's method of selecting school board members was unconstitutional because it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case arose when African American residents in Toombs County, Georgia, challenged their exclusion from juries and local school boards due to discriminatory practices by local officials who handpicked individuals for these roles based on personal knowledge rather than...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1969
Docket: 23
396 U.S. 346
90 S. Ct. 532
24 L. Ed. 2d 567
1970 U.S. LEXIS 3149
Argued: Oct 20, 1969

Turner Et Al. v. Fouche Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Turner et al. v. Fouche et al., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Georgia county's method of selecting school board members was unconstitutional because it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case arose when African American residents in Toombs County, Georgia, challenged their exclusion from juries and local school boards due to discriminatory practices by local officials who handpicked individuals for these roles based on personal knowledge rather than objective criteria or random selection processes. The court found that this system allowed for racial discrimination and was therefore unlawful under federal law which requires equal protection under the law for all citizens regardless of race or color.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Turner et al. v. Fouche et al., Justice Harlan argued that the majority's decision to strike down a Georgia law requiring school board members to be "freeholders" (property owners) was an overreach of judicial power. He contended that it is not within the Court's purview to dictate qualifications for local office, and such decisions should be left up to state and local governments as long as they do not violate explicit constitutional prohibitions or infringe upon federally protected rights. Harlan also disagreed with the majority’s interpretation of “one person, one vote” principle in this context, arguing that it does not apply because school boards are administrative bodies rather than legislative ones; therefore their membership needn't reflect population distribution exactly like electoral districts must.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Jan 19, 1970
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms