Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Turner v. Wilkes County Commissioners

• 1898 • 173 U.S. 461 • Fuller Court
In the 1898 case of Turner v. Wilkes County Commissioners, an African American man named William Turner sued the county commissioners of Wilkes County, North Carolina for racial discrimination. He claimed that his constitutional rights were violated when he was denied access to a public school because of his race. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the county commissioners, stating that while it is unlawful to deny any citizen equal protection under law based on their race or color as per...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1898
Docket: 642
173 U.S. 461
19 S. Ct. 464
43 L. Ed. 768
1899 U.S. LEXIS 1451

Turner v. Wilkes County Commissioners

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1898 case of Turner v. Wilkes County Commissioners, an African American man named William Turner sued the county commissioners of Wilkes County, North Carolina for racial discrimination. He claimed that his constitutional rights were violated when he was denied access to a public school because of his race. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the county commissioners, stating that while it is unlawful to deny any citizen equal protection under law based on their race or color as per Fourteenth Amendment, this does not mean all citizens are entitled to exactly same facilities and privileges without distinction or differentiation. They held that separate but equal facilities did not violate constitutional rights - a principle later overturned by Brown v Board of Education in 1954 which declared segregation inherently unequal.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the Turner v. Wilkes County Commissioners case argued that the majority's decision to uphold a law requiring voters to pay a poll tax before voting was unconstitutional. The dissenters believed this law violated citizens' right to vote, as it effectively disenfranchised those who could not afford to pay the tax. They contended that such laws were designed specifically with discriminatory intent and disproportionately affected poor and minority voters, thus violating equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority's assertion that states have broad powers in determining voter qualifications; while acknowledging states do have some discretion in setting these rules, they maintained this power is not absolute and must still comply with constitutional requirements for fairness and equality.

Opinion written by Justice RWPeckham
Decided: Mar 20, 1899
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms