Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Union Trust Company v. Morrison

• 1887 • 125 U.S. 591 • Waite Court
Union Trust Company v. Morrison was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1887. The case involved a dispute between the Union Trust Company and the Morrison family over the ownership of certain bonds. The Morrisons had purchased the bonds from the Union Trust Company, but the company later claimed that the bonds had been stolen from them and that the Morrisons had no right to them. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Morrisons, finding that the Union Trust Company had failed...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1887
Docket: 64
125 U.S. 591
8 S. Ct. 1004
31 L. Ed. 825
1888 U.S. LEXIS 1948
Argued: Nov 10, 1887

Union Trust Company v. Morrison

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Union Trust Company v. Morrison was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1887. The case involved a dispute between the Union Trust Company and the Morrison family over the ownership of certain bonds. The Morrisons had purchased the bonds from the Union Trust Company, but the company later claimed that the bonds had been stolen from them and that the Morrisons had no right to them. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Morrisons, finding that the Union Trust Company had failed to prove that the bonds had been stolen. The Court held that the company had not taken reasonable steps to protect the bonds and that the Morrisons had acted in good faith when they purchased them. The Court also found that the company had not provided sufficient evidence to prove that the bonds had been stolen. The Court's decision established that a party claiming ownership of a stolen item must provide sufficient evidence to prove that the item was stolen. It also established that a party who purchases an item in good faith is entitled to keep it, even if the item is later found to have been stolen.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Union Trust Company v. Morrison, arguing that the majority's decision was incorrect and should be reversed. He argued that under Missouri law, a mortgagee had no right to redeem property after foreclosure unless they paid off all of the debt associated with it. The majority held that this rule did not apply because there were two mortgages on the same property; however, Justice Field disagreed and stated that if one mortgage is foreclosed upon then any other mortgages become void as well since they are subordinate to the first lienholder. Furthermore, he argued that even though Union Trust Company was not aware of Morrison's prior mortgage when it issued its own loan against his land, this does not change their status as a second lienholder who has no right to redeem after foreclosure by another creditor. Therefore, Justice Field concluded that Union Trust Company could only recover what remained due on its loan from proceeds generated by sale of Morrison's land following foreclosure by St Louis County Bank - nothing more or less than what would have been owed without knowledge of an earlier existing debt secured against said real estate

Opinion written by Justice JPBradley
Decided: Apr 02, 1888
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms