Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mcmann

• 1977 • 434 U.S. 192 • Burger Court
In the United States Supreme Court case of United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMann in 1977, the court ruled on a dispute involving pension benefits for employees who had retired early due to disability. The plaintiff, Robert McMann, was an airline pilot who took early retirement after being diagnosed with heart disease and subsequently sued his former employer claiming that he should have been entitled to full pension benefits rather than reduced ones because his medical condition forced him into...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1977
Docket: 76-906
434 U.S. 192
98 S. Ct. 444
54 L. Ed. 2d 402
1977 U.S. LEXIS 162
Argued: Oct 04, 1977

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mcmann

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the United States Supreme Court case of United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMann in 1977, the court ruled on a dispute involving pension benefits for employees who had retired early due to disability. The plaintiff, Robert McMann, was an airline pilot who took early retirement after being diagnosed with heart disease and subsequently sued his former employer claiming that he should have been entitled to full pension benefits rather than reduced ones because his medical condition forced him into retirement earlier than planned. However, the Supreme Court sided with United Airlines stating that since McMann voluntarily chose to retire early and accept reduced benefits under a plan offered by his employer - despite knowing about other options available - he could not later claim additional compensation based on what might have occurred if he had chosen differently at the time of retirement.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMann, Justice Brennan disagreed with the majority's decision that an employee who voluntarily retired could not later sue his employer under ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act). He argued that this interpretation of voluntary retirement was too narrow and did not take into account whether or not the employee had been misled about their pension benefits prior to retiring. In his view, if an employee was deceived into taking early retirement based on false information about their pension plan provided by their employer, then they should have a right to legal recourse under ERISA. This would ensure employers are held accountable for providing accurate and complete information regarding employees' rights and benefits.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Dec 12, 1977
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms