United States et al. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al.

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case involved the United States government and several labor unions, including the International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers. The central issue was whether certain union activities violated federal law under the Taft-Hartley Act. Specifically, it examined if secondary boycotts conducted by these unions were unlawful. A secondary boycott is an organized effort to stop or disrupt business with a company that does not directly employ union workers but has dealings with another company that does. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States, holding that such actions did indeed violate provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act aimed at curbing unfair labor practices related to coercive tactics used during strikes or negotiations.

Opinion written by Justice Brennan

Decided 12 Jun 1961 · Official report

usrep367396.pdfOpen in a new tab