Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States, For The Use Of Hill, v. American Surety Company Of New York

• 1905 • 200 U.S. 197 • Fuller Court
In the case of United States, for the Use of Hill, v. American Surety Company of New York (1905), the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving a government contract and its sureties. The plaintiff, Hill, was subcontracted by MacArthur Brothers Company to provide materials and labor for a federal building project in Washington D.C., but did not receive full payment from them. As such, he sought compensation from American Surety Company who had issued bonds guaranteeing performance on behalf of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1905
Docket: 39
200 U.S. 197
26 S. Ct. 168
50 L. Ed. 437
1906 U.S. LEXIS 1468

United States, For The Use Of Hill, v. American Surety Company Of New York

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of United States, for the Use of Hill, v. American Surety Company of New York (1905), the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving a government contract and its sureties. The plaintiff, Hill, was subcontracted by MacArthur Brothers Company to provide materials and labor for a federal building project in Washington D.C., but did not receive full payment from them. As such, he sought compensation from American Surety Company who had issued bonds guaranteeing performance on behalf of MacArthur Brothers under Miller Act provisions. However, there were discrepancies between what was stated in the bond agreement and actual work performed which led to legal complications. The court held that while it is necessary for contractors to strictly adhere to their obligations as stipulated in contracts with sureties or face penalties; however if they have substantially complied with terms then courts may exercise discretion when enforcing these agreements especially where public interest is involved like construction projects funded by taxpayers' money. This decision underscored importance of good faith compliance within contractual relationships particularly those involving government entities thereby setting precedent for future cases related thereto.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of United States, for the use of Hill, v. American Surety Company of New York argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and misinterpreted federal law. The dissent contended that a surety company should not be held liable for damages beyond what is explicitly stated in its bond contract. In this case, American Surety had agreed to cover any default by a contractor up to a certain amount; however, it did not agree to pay additional penalties imposed under federal labor laws if the contractor failed to pay its workers properly. The dissent believed that holding sureties responsible for such penalties would discourage companies from acting as sureties and could potentially disrupt construction projects funded by government contracts.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Jan 02, 1906
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms