In the 1951 case United States ex rel. Jaegeler v. Carusi, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, et al., the U.S Supreme Court dealt with issues related to immigration law and deportation procedures. The petitioner, Jaegeler, was a German national who had been living in the United States since his arrival as a stowaway in 1923. In 1948 he was ordered to be deported on grounds that he had entered without inspection which is against immigration laws. He challenged this order arguing that it violated his rights under due process clause of Fifth Amendment because he wasn't given an opportunity for administrative or judicial review before being classified as deportable alien. The court ruled against him stating that there were no constitutional violations involved in his deportation proceedings because they followed all statutory requirements set by Congress regarding such matters; hence any claim about lack of fair hearing or review couldn’t stand legally valid. This decision highlighted how courts interpret and apply procedural safeguards provided by constitution when dealing with cases involving non-citizens' rights especially those concerning their stay within country's borders.

The dissenting opinion in the case of United States ex rel. Jaegeler v. Carusi, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, et al., argued that the majority's decision to deport Mr. Jaegeler was incorrect as it did not properly consider his status as a stateless person who had lived in the U.S for over 20 years without committing any crime or causing harm to society. The dissent emphasized that this deportation would result in undue hardship for Mr. Jaegeler since he had no country willing to accept him due to his lack of citizenship anywhere else other than America where he has spent most part of his life contributing positively towards its development and growth while abiding by all laws governing residents' conduct within its jurisdictional boundaries throughout these years.